| The Advanced Computing Environment (ACE) was defined by an industry consortium in the early 1990s to be the next generation commodity computing platform after DOS-based Personal Computers. The consortium was led by
Compaq, Microsoft, MIPS Computer Systems, Digital Equipment Corporation, and the Santa Cruz Operation. Other members of the consortium included
Acer, Control Data Corporation, Kobuta, NEC Corporation, NKK, Olivetti, Prime Computer, Pyramid Technology,
Siemens, Silicon
Graphics, Sony, Sumitomo, Tandem, Wang Laboratories, and
Zenith Data Systems.
Besides these large companies, several start-up companies built ACE
compliant systems as well.
The environment standardized on the MIPS architecture microprocessor family. The environment standardized on two operating systems - SCO UNIX
with Open Desktop and what would
become Windows NT (originally named OS/2 3.0). The Advanced RISC Computing (ARC) document was produced to
give hardware and firmware specifications for the platform.
The porting of the Microsoft operating system to other instruction set
architectures created hope that other hardware plaforms could more effectively compete with Wintel PCs . The belief was that RISC based computers would deliver superior price-performance than that of the older platform.
Eventually, Windows NT was also ported to the DEC Alpha and PowerPC processors as well.
This initiative (and consortium) fell apart within a few years as it became apparent that there was not a mass market for an
alternative to the Wintel computing platform. The upstart platforms did not offer
enough performance improvement from the incumbent PC and there was major cost disadvantages of such systems due to the low volume
production. When the initiative started, RISC based systems (running at 100-200Mhz at the
time) had substantial performance advantage over Intel 80486 and original
Pentium chips (running at approximately 60Mhz at the time). Intel quickly migrated
the Pentium design to newer semiconductor process generations and that
performance (and operating frequency) advantage slipped away.
One of the first companies to leave the consortium was Compaq. The unsubstantiated rumor was that Intel threatened that
company to not deliver sufficient quantities of processor chips to support Compaq's then current production rate.
The initiative was used by chip companies as an attempt to take market share away from Intel. System companies used the
initiative as an attempt to take market share away from the workstation
leader, Sun Microsystems.
The AIM alliance was a competing initiative, being led by Apple Computer, IBM and Motorola.
External links
|
