Abaara topic: Peer-to-peer

 

Abaara - Free Knowledge Database & Resources
 ABAARA
Abaara topic: Peer-to-peer
 Categories

 e-Learning Platform

 Web Packages

 Newsletter

eLeaP eLearning Management Systems LMS LCMS Systems. Online training made easy. Free trial now.
 
Peer-to-peer

A peer-to-peer (or P2P) computer network is a network that relies on computing power at the edges (ends) of a connection rather than in the network itself. It's one of the key technical concepts of the internet, described in the first internet RFC, "RFC 1, Host Software" [1] (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1.txt) dated 7 April 1969. More recently the concept has achieved wide prominence among the general public in the context of the absence of central indexing servers in architectures used for exchanging multimedia files.

One example of a peer-to-peer system is email sending and integrity checking. A typical email is prepared by the sender, passes through many network switches, routers and mail hubs and then arrives at the recipient's email client. One approach to ensuring the integrity of the email would be to have every connection along the route understand the email protocol and verify the integrity of the email at each step. Changing the email system, perhaps to add support for HTML emails, audio or video, would require changing all of the network equipment between each sender and recipient, a massive task. Instead, the intelligence to verify the integrity of the email is placed at each edge of the exchange, in the sending and receiving email systems. If the email is damaged, the receiving system notices and informs the sender, who can retransmit the email.

Networking technologies and applications which use this model include the NNTP protocol used for transferring Usenet news, SMTP for mail transactions, ARPANET, decentralized live chat Java applets or BBS FidoNet. Indeed, almost all models used with the internet are peer to peer at the network levels.

One of the first uses of the phrase "peer-to-peer" is in 1984, with the development of the "Advanced Peer-to-Peer Networking" architecture at IBM. Different peer-to-peer networks have varying P2P overlays.

The peer-to-peer paradigm has been used to deploy publish/subscribe systems (i.e, a system where users subscribe via the creation of a persistent query and asynchronously receive notifications when matching events take place). An example of such publish/subscribe system is P2P-DIET.

File sharing networks such as Gnutella, FastTrack, and the original incarnation of Napster provide facilities for free (and somewhat anonymous) file transfer between personal computers connected to the Internet.

A pure peer-to-peer file transfer network does not have the notion of clients or servers, but only equal peer nodes that simultaneously function as both "clients" and "servers" to the other nodes on the network. This model of network arrangement differs from the client-server model where communication is usually to and from a central server. A typical example for a non peer-to-peer file transfer is an FTP server. One user uploads a file to the FTP server, then many others download it, with no need for the uploader and downloader to be connected at the same time.

Some networks and channels, such as Napster, OpenNap, or IRC @find, use a client-server structure for some tasks (e.g. searching) and a peer-to-peer structure for others. Networks such as Gnutella or Freenet, use a peer-to-peer structure for all purposes and are sometimes referred to as true peer-to-peer networks, though Gnutella at least is greatly facilitated by directory servers which inform peers of the network addresses of other peers.

An important goal in peer-to-peer networks is that the bandwidth of all clients can be used, so the total bandwidth - and usually the available download bandwidth for the average user - grows with the number of nodes, instead of all clients having to share the bandwidth of one server, where adding more clients could mean slower data transfer for all users.

When the term peer-to-peer was used to describe the Napster network, it implied that the peer protocol nature was important, but in reality the great achievement of Napster was the empowerment of the peers (i.e., the fringes of the network) in association with a central index which made it fast and efficient to locate available content. The peer protocol was just a common way to achieve this.

While much media attention has focussed on copyright infringing uses of file trading networks there are a vast number of entirely non-infringing uses. BitTorrent was originally designed with the idea to keep sites from getting overwhelmed by "flash crowds" and heavy traffic. That makes it very suitable for many situations where there are massive peaks of demand. Most Linux distributions are released via BitTorrent to help with their bandwidth needs. Another example is Blizzard Entertainment (http://www.blizzard.com), which uses a modified version of BitTorrent to distribute patches to its game World of Warcraft (http://www.worldofwarcraft.com) (often complained about due to a bandwidth cap which almost defeats its purpose).

There are other peer-to-peer networks in development too, such as PeerCast which allows someone to broadcast an Internet radio or TV station with very little upstream bandwidth due to its distributed nature. Other peer-to-peer broadcast tools, sometime called Peercasting, include the IceShare project, and FreeCast (http://www.freecast.org).

Generational classification of peer-to-peer file sharing networks

Some people describe peer-to-peer file-sharing networks by their 'generation'. In this context, they are referring only to the popular internet-based file-sharing networks, not earlier research- and business-oriented peer-to-peer systems, which pre-date them.

First generation

The first generation of peer-to-peer file sharing networks had a centralized file list, like Napster. Courts in the United States ruled that whoever controlled this centralized file list containing works being infringed was responsible for any infringement of copyright. Ultimately, Napster was held liable even if it used the most advanced technology available to identify works copyright holders had asked it to block, because no technology which can identify works with 100% certainty exists or can exist. This effectively forced the company out of business.

Second generation

The second generation of peer-to-peer networks had decentralized file lists, such as Gnutella and FastTrack. This was a necessary step for the creators of the network, as any central body could be held liable for copyright infringement following the Napster court decision.

Also usually included in the second generation are distributed hash table networks and other optimizations of decentralized searching.

Third generation

The third generation of peer-to-peer networks are improvements upon generations one and two which often have efficiency, reliability, or anonymity features built in. Examples of anonymous networks are Freenet, I2P, GNUnet, Entropy.

Friend-to-friend networks only allow already known users (aka "friends") to connect to your computer, then each node can forward requests and files anonymously between its own "friends" nodes; some of these networks are: MUTE / Napshare / ANts P2P / WASTE.

Legal controversy

The files shared on such networks are often popular music files in MP3 format, and popular movies in MPEG-4 format. This has led many observers, including most media companies and some peer-to-peer advocates, to conclude that these networks pose grave threats to the established distribution model for copyrighted multimedia works. One of the most famous leaks was unreleased Madonna songs including her 2000 hit "Music" prior to its official commercial release.

Consequently, peer-to-peer networks have been targeted by the representatives of those artists and organizations who license their creative works, including industry trade organizations such as the RIAA and MPAA as a potential threat. The Napster service was shut down by an RIAA lawsuit; both the RIAA and the MPAA spend large amounts of money attempting to lobby lawmakers for the enforcement of existing laws.

As actions to defend artists' rights by media companies expand, the networks have seemed to adapt at a quick pace and have become technologically more difficult to dismantle. This has caused the users of such systems to become targets, because while the underlying technology may be legal, the abuse of it by individuals redistributing content in a copyright infringing way is clearly not.

Anonymous peer-to-peer networks allow for distribution of material - legal or not - with little or no legal accountability. Many people believe this will lead to trading of child pornography and facilitate terrorism, and call for its regulation on those grounds. Others counter that the potential for illegal uses should not prevent the technology from being used for legal purposes, and that the presumption of innocence should apply.

Computer science perspective

Technically, a completely pure peer-to-peer application must implement only peering protocols that do not recognize the concepts of "server" and "client". Such pure peer applications and networks are rare. Most networks and applications described as peer-to-peer actually contain or rely on some non-peer elements, such as DNS. Also, real world applications often use multiple protocols and act as client, server, and peer simultaneously, or over time. Completely decentralized networks of peers have been in use for many years, two examples include USENET (1979) and FidoNet (1984).

Many P2P systems use stronger peers (super-peers, super-nodes) as servers and client-peers are connected in a star like fashion to a single super-peer.

Sun added classes to the Java technology to speed the development of peer-to-peer applications quickly in the late 1990s so that developers could build decentralized real time chat applets and applications before Instant Messaging networks were popular. This effort is now being continued with the JXTA project.

Peer-to-peer systems and applications have attracted a great deal of attention from computer science research; some prominent research projects include the Chord project, ARPANET, the PAST storage utility, the P-Grid, a self-organized and emerging overlay network and the CoopNet content distribution system (see below for external links related to these projects).

Attacks on Peer-to-peer networks

Many peer-to-peer networks are under constant attack by people with a variety of motives.

Examples include:

  • poisoning attacks (providing files whose contents are different than the description)
  • denial of service attacks (attacks that may make the network run very slowly or break completely)
  • defection attacks (users or software that make use of the network without contributing resources to it)
  • insertion of viruses to carried data (e.g. downloaded or carried files may be infected with viruses or other malware)
  • malware in the peer-to-peer network software itself (e.g. the software may contain spyware)
  • filtering (network operators may attempt to prevent peer-to-peer network data from being carried)
  • identity attacks (e.g. tracking down the users of the network and harrassing or legally attacking them)
  • spamming (e.g. sending unsolicited information across the network- not necessarily as a denial of service attack)

Most attacks can be defeated or controlled by careful design of the peer-to-peer network and through the use of encryption. P2P network defense is in fact closely related to the "Byzantine Generals Problem". However, almost any network will fail when the majority of the peers are trying to damage it, and many protocols may be rendered impotent by far fewer numbers.

Networks, protocols and applications

Format:

  • network/protocol
    • applications using that network (operating system)

All networks and protocols are in alphabetical order except very similar applications which are listed in one entry with the most important one first, determining the place of this very similar applications in the list.

All sites are ranked via http://zeropaid.com/ to help you find the most popular Peer-to-Peer network. An earlier generation of peer-to-peer systems were called "metacomputing" or were classed as "middleware". These include:

Multi-network applications

Format:

  • application (networks/protocols) (operating systems)

External links

  • BetBug (http://www.BetBug.com) BetBug was the first P2P network to enable secure financial transactions across an untrusted, anonymous P2P network
  • The File Sharing Portal (http://filesharing.bz/) - Programs, News, Forums
  • myBittorrent (http://www.myBittorrent.com) myBittorrent is the biggest BitTorrent site offering everything you need for the Torrent P2P network
  • IBM Developer Works: The practice of peer-to-peer computing (http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-p2pcol.html)
  • MindGem (http://www.mindgem.com/experience/article-topic-7.html) - Current P2P News with a Special Focus on Legal Aspects of File Sharing (DEAD as of August 26th, 2004)
  • OpenP2P (http://www.openp2p.com/)
  • bSoftware Peer to peer (http://www.bsoftware.com/)
  • http://best2p.com/ The File Sharing Forum]
  • Wired News: Still Plenty of Music Out There (http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,41775,00.html) - An overview of mostly peer-to-peer software, published Feb. 13, 2001.
  • P2P.co.uk (http://www.p2p.co.uk/) - A search engine which searches peer-to-peer networks.
  • Slyck (http://www.slyck.com/)- A site giving greatly detailed information and advice on the different P2P networks and software
  • The File Sharing News (http://www.p2pinfo.net/)
  • Zeropaid.com (http://www.zeropaid.com/) - The File Sharing Portal - Programs, News, Forums
  • The P2P Revolution (http://www.scottjensenshow.com/P2PRevolution.pdf) - A white paper about the future of p2p networking and the entertainment industry. This paper was released just before the RIAA lawsuits against individual p2p users in 2003 and discussed what would happen if such was done. It was correct in its prediction. Time will tell if its other predictions are as accurate.
  • wikibooks: P2P File sharing
  • Using Linux firewalls to filter Peer-to-peer traffic (http://www.lowth.com/p2pwall)
  • CyberTelly.com (http://www.cybertelly.com/) - Web site with information about ByteTornado

Canada's approach to p2p and copyright

  • C|net (http://news.com.com/2100-1027_3-5182641.html) Article entititled "Judge: File Sharing is Legal in Canada." In Spring 2004, file sharing via p2p networks was affirmed as legal in Canada.
  • Canadian Private Copying Collective (http://www.cpcc.ca/english/index.htm) Since 1998, private copying of music for personal use is entirely legal in Canada. A levy was established on blank media sales in order to compensate artists for lost revenue due to file-sharing, and the CPCC was founded to oversee the levy process. The levy was renewed in December 2004.
  • Copyright Board of Canada (http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/news/c20032004fs-e.html) Government copyright policy.
  • Copyfight: A Tale of Two Cities (http://www.lexinformatica.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=33&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0) Article contrasting Ottawa and Washington, D.C.'s assessment of copyright parameters and the issue of criminal sanctions.
  • Digital Rights Management in Canada (http://www.info-mech.com/drm_in_canada.html) An advocacy website offering an introduction to digital rights management and links to licensed file sharers.
  • Digital Copyright Canada (http://www.digital-copyright.ca/) A forum created to host public dialogue concerning digital copyright and related issues. Includes a news aggregate.
  • Numbers Don't Crunch Against Downloading (http://www.michaelgeist.ca/resc/html_bkup/nov292004.html) Michael Geist, a professor at the University of Ottawa, discusses the financial impact of downloading on the recording industry. This column appeared in the Toronto Star, November 29th 2004.
  • p2pnet.net (http://p2pnet.net/story/3122) An op-ed urging solidarity between musicians and Canadian consumers.


Computer science research



In telecommunications, the acronym P2P is often used to refer to Point-to-Point.

P2P can also stand for Pay-to-play (as in Pay-to-play/P2P games).



See also:
| AnimeSuki | Friend-to-friend | Undercover marketing | Anonymous P2P | BearShare | Servent | JXTA | Internet Relay Chat | Grabster |
< Back
 
Web info.abaara.com
 


Categories: Computer terminology | Electronic commerce | File sharing | Peer to peer

 Web Results


 

This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

 

 
Page topic: Peer-to-peer