|
Schisms among the Jews:
First Temple era
Based on the historical narrative in the Bible and archeology, Levantine civilization at the time of Solomon's Temple was prone to idol worship, astrology, worship of reigning kings, and paganism. (Some of the divinities or idols worshipped included Ba'al and
possibly Asherah.) This was in direct contrast to the teachings in the Torah, and was condemned by the ancient Biblical prophets who attacked those Israelites and Judeans who became idol worshipers. The split by the Kingdom of Israel from the Kingdom of Judah was completed by Jeraboam who crowned
himself king, and built a northern temple with calf-like idol images that were condemned by the Judeans of Judah. After the destruction and exile of the northern Kingdom of Israel by Assyria,
the temptations to follow non-Judaic practices continued, so that according to the narratives of Jeremiah and others, it brought about the failure, destruction, and
exile of the southern Kingdom of Judah by Babylonia. Nebuchadnezzar had additional reasons
for taking over Judah and turning its inhabitants into exiles, including challenging its great rival Egypt.
Second Temple era
This was a time when the Jews lived under Persian, Greek, and Roman power and influence. The main internal struggles during this era were between the Pharisees and the Sadducees, as well as
the Essenes and Zealots. The Pharisees wanted to maintain the authority and traditions of classical Torah teachings
and began the early teachings of the Mishna, maintaining the authority of the Sanhedrin, the supreme Jewish court. The Sadducees sought to adapt to more Hellenistic ideas, as
espoused by Philo of Egypt. The Essenes
preached a reclusive way of life. The Zealots advocated armed rebellion against any
foreign power such as Rome. All were at violent logger-heads with each other, leading to
the confusion and disunity that ended with the destruction of the Second
Temple and the sacking of Jerusalem by Rome.
Break-offs: Samaritans and Christians
One small sect of Samaritans is still extant; however, their religion is not
the same as rabbinic Judaism. The Samaritan faith and that of other Jews diverged
over a millennium ago; they commonly refer to themselves as Samaritan Israelites as opposed to Jewish Israelites.
This is because they believe they are of the northern Israelite tribes.
Of course, the most famous schism in Jewish history was the split between the followers of Jesus (who were known as Notzrim or Nazarenes) with the claim by
his disciples that he was the long-awaited Jewish Messiah, and the majority Pharisees (the rabbinically led Jews) who rejected him 2,000 years ago and still do so.
The Samaritans, on the other hand, largely became Christians, as they are depicted in the Talmud.
The abandonment of Jewish law by Jesus' followers and their promotion of him as a deity, along with the publication of the
New Testament, ensured that Christianity and Judaism would become completely different and often conflicting religions. The New Testament
depicts the Saducees and Pharisees
as Jesus' opponents, whereas the Jewish perspective has the Pharisees as the justified followers of the rabbis who upheld the
Torah, or what Christians refer to as the "Old Testament" as a mark of their having supplanted the Jews' position. This is known as Supersessionism, and is strongly rejected by Jews and Judaism. Recently, some
Christian churches have rejected or softened their teachings on supersessionism.
Karaite Judaism
Main article: Karaite Judaism
Karaite Judaism is a Jewish denomination characterized
by reliance on the Tanakh as the sole scripture and rejection of the Oral Law (the Mishnah and Talmud). Karaites had a wide following
between the 9th and 12th centuries, (they claim that at one time they numbered perhaps 40 percent of Jewry), but over the
centuries their numbers have dwindled drastically. Today they are a small group, living mostly in Israel; estimates of the number of Israeli Karaites range from as low as 10,000 to as high as 40,000 [1] (http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_402.html#2209) [2] (http://www.turkiye.net/sota/karaisr.html) [3] (http://qumran.com/Karaite%20Information/israels_karaites.htm) [4] (http://qumran.com/Karaite%20Information/karaite_true_believers.htm).
There is a divergence of views about the historical origins of Karaite
Judaism. Most scholars and some Karaites maintain that it was founded at least in part by Anan ben David, whereas other Karaites believe that they are not the historical disciples of Anan ben David at all, and point out that many of their later sages (such as
Ya'acov Al-Kirkisani) argued that most of Anan's teachings were "derived from Rabbanite Lore".
The state of Israel, along with its Chief Rabbinate, ruled that Karaites are Jews, and while critical differences between
Orthodox Judaism and Karaite Judaism exist, American Orthodox
rabbis ruled that Karaism is much closer to Orthodoxy than the Conservative and Reform movements, which may ease issues of formal
conversion.
Sabbatians and Frankists
In 1648 Shabtai Tzvi declared
himself to be the long-awaited Jewish Messiah whilst living in the Ottoman Empire. Vast numbers of Jews believed him; but when under pain of a
death sentence in front of the Turkish sultan Mehmed IV he became an apostate to Judaism by becoming a Muslim, his movement crumbled. Nevertheless, for centuries, small groups of Jews believed in
him, and the rabbis were always on guard against any manifestations of this schism,
always suspicious of hidden "Shebselach" (Yiddish for "little Sabbatians," a play on the word for "young dumb sheep").
Indeed, when the movement of Hasidism began attracting many followers, the rabbis
were once again suspicious that this was Sabbatianism in different garb. It would take many centuries to sort out these complex
divisions and schisms and see where they were headed.
After his mysterious death somewhere in the area of Turkish Albania, groups of
Jews continued to be clandestine followers of Shabtai Tzvi even though they had outwardly converted to Islam, these Jews being known as the Donmeh. Jewish converts to Islam
were, at times, therefore regarded with great suspicion by their fellow Muslims.
A few decades after Shabtai's death, a man by the name of Jacob Frank
claiming mystical powers preached that he was Shabtai Tzvi's successor. He attracted a following, preached against the Talmud, advocated a form of licentious worship, and was condemned by the rabbis at the time.
When confronted by the Polish authorities, he converted to Catholicism in 1759 in the presence of King Augustus III of Poland, together with groups of his Jewish
followers, known as "Frankists". To the alarm of his opponents, he was received by reigning European monarchs who were anxious to
see their Jewish subjects abandon Judaism and apostacise. The Frankists eventually
joined the Polish nobility and gentry.
Orthodox versus Reform, East versus West
From the time of the French Revolution of 1789, and the growth of Liberalism, added to the political and
personal freedoms granted by Napoleon to the Jews of Europe, many Jews chose to
abandon the forboding and isolating ghettos and enter into general society. This
influenced the internal conflicts about religion, culture, and politics of the Jews to this day.
Some Jews in Western Europe, and many Jews in America, joined the religiously liberal new Reform Judaism movement, which drew inspiration from the writings of modernist thinkers like Moses Mendelson. They coined the name "Orthodox" to describe those who
opposed the "Reform". They were criticized by the Orthodox Judaism
rabbis such as Samson Raphael Hirsch in Germany, and
condemned, particularly by those known today as followers of Haredi
Judaism, and the leaders of Hasidic Judaism, the disciples of the Baal Shem Tov, based mainly in Eastern Europe.
There was thus also created a cultural schism between the more westernised English, German
and French-speaking Western European Jews and their more religiously observant Yiddish speaking Eastern European brethren whom they
denigratingly labelled Ost Yidden ("Eastern Jews"). These schisms and the debates surrounding them, continue with much
ferocity in all Jewish communities today as the Reform and Orthodox movements continue to confront each other over a wide range
of religious, social, political and ethnic issues.
|