| The term working class is used to denote a social class. The
definition of the term "working class" is controversial, and depends on the politics and period of the person making the
definition and on the society being discussed. For example, pre-war
British writers often defined class as being at least partly inherited,
whereas Americans were more likely to emphasize current income and
employment status.
Working for wages
Although some people who can reasonably be considered workers draw salaries,
generally the working class works for wages. So defined, they consititute about 80% of the
workforce in the United
States. Also in the United States, following a slight rise in real wages
during the dot com boom of the late 1990s, their income has slipped
slightly during the first years of the 21st century. [1] (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/business/18WAGES.html)
As defined by Marx
Karl Marx defined the "working class" or proletariat as "those individuals who sell their labor and do not own the means of production" whom he believed
to be responsible for creating the wealth of a society (buildings, bridges and furniture, for example, are physically built by
members of this class; many new inventions and other "intellectual products" are also created by people who work for wages).
The proletariat are further subdivided by Marxists into the ordinary proletariat and the lumpenproletariat (rag-proletariat), those who are extremely poor and cannot find legal work
on a regular basis. These may be prostitutes, beggars, or homeless people.
Criticism of the working class
Some of the more wealthy members of society have blamed many of the problems of working class people on excessive consumption
of alcohol, laziness, failure to save
money, and more recently satellite television, spectator sports and drugs. In
reference to this, Oscar Wilde said "Work is the curse of the drinking
classes". This does not necessarily mean that the working class is morally inferior to the wealthier classes. First, it isn't
clear whether the working class are really any less hardworking than the wealthier classes, as such a trait is difficult to
measure. Indeed, regardless of whether they enjoy it or not, working class people arguably do the most difficult labor, which is
the very reason they are called "working class" in the first place. Furthermore, if the working class does show more
dysfunctional behavior, this could be the result of the sparse opportunities and constant hardships that they have faced. Such
behavior could be a result of socioeconomic conditions as much as those conditions could be a result of dysfunctional behavior;
the cause-effect relationship is not well established.
While some view religion as the key to overcoming these problems, Karl Marx spoke of religion as "...the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a
heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people" (A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's
Philosophy of Right, 1844). He argued that it gives "false hope" and encourages passivity among the working class. As a
consequence, most (but not all) Marxists oppose organized religion. On the other hand, Christian socialists, who may hold many political views in common with Marxism, actively embrace
religion.
Working class people generally have less advantages from the start.
Further reading
- Moran, W. (2002). Belles of New England: The women of the textile mills and the families whose wealth they wove.
New York: St Martin's Press, ISBN
0312301839.
- Michael Zweig, Working Class Majority: America's Best Kept Secret, Cornell University Press (2001), trade paperback,
198 pages, ISBN 0801487277
|
